Institution record
Anchorage
Anchorage Digital Bank National Association
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (firms authorised in the uk, ireland and gibraltar) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Anchorage against peer institutions in our firms authorised in the uk, ireland and gibraltar dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anchorage (this record) | MASOCC | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Coinbase | CBIFCACBI+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| MUFG Bank | PRAFCAOCC+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| CMCMarkets | FCAFCAFMA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Saxo | FCADKFSAFINMA+5 | 8 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Mizuho Securities | FCABaFinMAS+4 | 6 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Anchorage: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Anchorage's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Anchorage (legal entity reference: Anchorage Digital Bank National Association) holds 2 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 2 are marked regulated or registered: MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence 427752, status: regulated, Tier-1; OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (U.S.)) — licence 25243, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official MAS, OCC public register.
Which of Anchorage's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Anchorage is tracked under our firms authorised in the uk, ireland and gibraltar coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 2 recorded licences (MAS, OCC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Anchorage's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Anchorage carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Anchorage's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Anchorage, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (anchorage.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to MAS.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from QuantCalc Tools relevant to Anchorage's supervisory scope.
Fixed Income Duration & Portfolio Risk
Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Closed-Form Mathematical Specification & IEEE-754 Verification (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)
Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing exact floating-point precision, day-count
Cleared Margin & VaR Models
Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Worked $100M Institutional Portfolio Verification Example (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)
Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing step-by-step cash flow, margin, and basis-
Risk-Adjusted Performance Benchmarks
Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Observation Shift vs. Lookback Convention Comparison (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)
Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing accrual period weighting differences and s
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines
Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Historical Stress Testing & Tail-Risk Scenario Calibration (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)
Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing 2008 Lehman, 2020 Dash-for-Cash, and 2026
