Institution record
SASA CAPITAL
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (firms authorised in the uk, ireland and gibraltar) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing SASA CAPITAL against peer institutions in our firms authorised in the uk, ireland and gibraltar dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SASA CAPITAL (this record) | SCMN | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Coinbase | CBIFCACBI+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| Kraken | CBICBIFCA+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| eToro | FCAGFSCFSA+5 | 6 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| MUFG Bank | PRAFCAOCC+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| CMCMarkets | FCAFCAFMA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
SASA CAPITAL: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is SASA CAPITAL's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, SASA CAPITAL (legal entity reference: SASA CAPITAL) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: SCMN (Securities and Commodities Market of Montenegro) — licence 03/2-3/4-19, status: regulated, Tier-3. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SCMN public register.
Which of SASA CAPITAL's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
SASA CAPITAL is tracked under our firms authorised in the uk, ireland and gibraltar coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Forex, Options) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (SCMN) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is SASA CAPITAL's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
SASA CAPITAL carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to SASA CAPITAL's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with SASA CAPITAL, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SCMN.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from QuantCalc Tools relevant to SASA CAPITAL's supervisory scope.
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines
NY Fed SOFR Index ACT/360 In-Arrears Compounding Engine: Closed-Form Mathematical Specification & IEEE-754 Verification (4.4151% 90-Day Annualized Benchmark)
NY Fed SOFR Index ACT/360 In-Arrears Compounding Engine (SOFR-INDEX-ACT360) stands at 4.4151% (90-Day Annualized) (Source: NY Fed Reference Rates, 2026-10-20), governing exact floating-point precision, day-count conventi
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines
NY Fed SOFR Index ACT/360 In-Arrears Compounding Engine: Cross-Margining & Capital Efficiency Optimization (4.4151% 90-Day Annualized Benchmark)
NY Fed SOFR Index ACT/360 In-Arrears Compounding Engine (SOFR-INDEX-ACT360) stands at 4.4151% (90-Day Annualized) (Source: NY Fed Reference Rates, 2026-10-20), governing inter-commodity correlation offsets and liquidity
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines
CME SPAN 2 VaR Margin, Basel FRTB Expected Shortfall & Fractional Kelly Sizing Engine
Institutional risk specification comparing CME SPAN 2 Historical/Stress VaR margin decomposition, Basel III FRTB 97.5% Expected Shortfall, and autocorrelation-adjusted Sharpe, Sortino, and Half-Kelly position sizing in a 4.39% SOFR regime.
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines
CME SPAN 2 Historical & Stress Value-at-Risk (VaR) Model: Historical Stress Testing & Tail-Risk Scenario Calibration (6.26% Initial Margin / Notional Benchmark)
CME SPAN 2 Historical & Stress Value-at-Risk (VaR) Model (CME-SPAN2-VAR) stands at 6.26% (Initial Margin / Notional) (Source: CME Clearing, 2026-10-20), governing 2008 Lehman, 2020 Dash-for-Cash, and 2026 rate-shock quan