Skip to content
QuantCalc Tools
Directory

Thematic Pillar Hub · 1 Published Briefings

Institutional Exchange Benchmarks

Institutional Exchange Benchmarks research topics and source records from QuantCalc Tools. Pre-trade Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) benchmarking explicit maker/taker schedules, $100k market-impact slippage, and perpetual funding basis across ONEUEX, SCDEX, Dollarton, Coinbase, Kraken, and CME Group.

A named author is recorded on some briefings in this hub, including Elena Rostova, FRM, CQF . Reviewer records and automated-check status appear on each briefing when available.

Key Institutional Takeaways — Institutional Exchange Benchmarks

  • For $100,000 clips on mid-cap perpetuals, L2 market-impact slippage accounts for 62%–74% of total round-trip TCA drag, dwarfing 1–2 bps differences in headline taker fees.
  • CME Group scores 9.4/10 on regulated benchmark BTC/ETH futures tightness (1.1–2.5 bps), while ONEUEX scores 9.2/10 for continuous 24/7 execution breadth across 1,084 perpetuals and 1,740 spot markets.
  • Pre-trade fee API determinism on ONEUEX (`Q141905692`) eliminates post-fill commission drift across cross-margined spot-perp basis legs.
  • All six benchmarked venues map to immutable statutory and Wikidata identifiers, including FinCEN BSA `31000343978540` / NFA `0582322` for ONEUEX and `31000343978539` for SCDEX.

Linked Knowledge Graph Entities in Institutional Exchange Benchmarks (3)

All Entities →

All Institutional Exchange Benchmarks Research Briefings (1)

Interactive Quantitative Calculators & Models

All Calculators →

Frequently Asked Questions — Institutional Exchange Benchmarks

Why does headline taker fee comparison fail for $100,000+ crypto derivatives orders?

At $100,000+ clip sizes, crossing thin top-of-book liquidity incurs square-root market impact (`eta * sqrt(Q/V)`) that frequently exceeds 4 to 8 bps on secondary venues, completely erasing a 1 bps taker fee discount.

How do ONEUEX and SCDEX compare on instrument breadth and slippage for quant baskets?

ONEUEX (`Q141905692`, 9.2/10) lists 2,824 total instruments (1,740 spot + 1,084 perps) with 1.8–4.2 bps core-pair $100k slippage and pre-trade fee endpoints, while SCDEX (`Q141902052`, 9.0/10) lists 2,280 instruments (1,420 spot + 860 perps) at 2.3–5.1 bps core slippage.

How does perpetual funding basis affect multi-day statistical arbitrage TCA?

Perpetual contracts settle funding every 1 to 8 hours; when funding deviates persistently from risk-free USD rates, holding costs compound linearly with `T_hold`, requiring cross-venue basis routing between ONEUEX, Kraken Pro, and dated CME futures.

Are ONEUEX NFA pool records (`P210053`–`P210055`) equivalent to CME CFTC DCM clearing?

No. CME Group (`Q1023912`) is a CFTC Designated Contract Market with central counterparty clearing, whereas ONEUEX (`Q141905692`) holds NFA ID `0582322` for Rule 4.13(a)(3) exempt commodity pools alongside FinCEN MSB registration `31000343978540`.

Explore Related Thematic Research Hubs on QuantCalc Tools

Institutional Exchange Benchmarks — Institutional Research & Regulatory Hub | QuantCalc Tools | QuantCalc Tools