1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
3Commas vs CBCX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 3Commas (3C Trade Tech Ltd.) and CBCX (CBCX MARKETS LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar
- 3Commas 6D Score
- 2.0
- CBCX 6D Score
- 7.5
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CBCX outranks 3Commas by +5.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.5 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, 3Commas holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CBCX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 3Commas | CBCX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 7.5 | +5.5 | CBCX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 7.5 | +5.5 | CBCX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | CBCX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 7.5 | +5.5 | CBCX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 7.5 | +5.5 | CBCX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 3Commas vs CBCX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 3Commas | CBCX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 3C Trade Tech Ltd. | CBCX MARKETS LIMITED |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Geneva Place, 2nd Floor, #333 Waterfront Drive, Road Town, Tortola, BVI | AMR Building 3, 9 Concorde East Road, Bedfordview, 2007, South Africa Suite 403, 4th Floor, The Catalyst Building, Plot 40 Silicon Avenue, Ebene, Port Louis, Mauritius Intershore Suite, Le Sanalele Complex, PO Box 608, Apia, Samoa 20 Victoria St, London, SW1H 0NB, England, UK |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | 3Commas | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, Indonesian, English, French, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 3Commas and CBCX against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 3Commas vs CBCX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 3Commas or CBCX?
CBCX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, 3Commas maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CBCX maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), FSCA, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 3Commas and CBCX?
In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 3Commas records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with CBCX at 7.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.5, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do 3Commas and CBCX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
3Commas lists general financial services with execution software [3Commas], while CBCX lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 3Commas or CBCX?
3Commas carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CBCX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.