Skip to content
QuantCalc Tools
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

4T Limited vs CBCX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 4T Limited (4T Limited) and CBCX (CBCX MARKETS LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar

4T Limited 6D Score
5.0
CBCX 6D Score
7.5
Regulated Licences
1 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: 4t-vs-cbcx

CBCX outranks 4T Limited by +2.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.5 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, 4T Limited holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CBCX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology Weight4T LimitedCBCXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.07.5+2.5CBCX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.07.5+1.5CBCX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.07.5+2.5CBCX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.07.5+1.5CBCX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: 4T Limited vs CBCX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: 4T Limited vs CBCX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between 4T Limited and CBCX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit Attribute4T LimitedCBCX
Primary Legal Name4T LimitedCBCX MARKETS LIMITED
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressSeychelles, Mahe, Victoria, Olivier Maradan Building, 1st FloorAMR Building 3, 9 Concorde East Road, Bedfordview, 2007, South Africa Suite 403, 4th Floor, The Catalyst Building, Plot 40 Silicon Avenue, Ebene, Port Louis, Mauritius Intershore Suite, Le Sanalele Complex, PO Box 608, Apia, Samoa 20 Victoria St, London, SW1H 0NB, England, UK
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX, indices, commodities, government bonds, stocksPrecious metals, Indices, Forex, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesArabic, EnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, Indonesian, English, French, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare 4T Limited and CBCX against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: 4T Limited vs CBCX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 4T Limited or CBCX?

CBCX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, 4T Limited maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CBCX maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), FSCA, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 4T Limited and CBCX?

In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 4T Limited records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with CBCX at 7.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.5, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do 4T Limited and CBCX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

4T Limited lists FX, indices, commodities, government bonds, stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while CBCX lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 4T Limited or CBCX?

4T Limited carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CBCX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

4T Limited vs CBCX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | QuantCalc Tools