1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CBCX vs CXM Direct: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CBCX (CBCX MARKETS LIMITED) and CXM Direct (CXM Direct LLC) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar
- CBCX 6D Score
- 7.5
- CXM Direct 6D Score
- 7.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CBCX outranks CXM Direct by +0.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.5 vs 7.0)
On supervisory breadth, CBCX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CXM Direct holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CBCX | CXM Direct | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.5 | 7.0 | +0.5 | CBCX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.5 | 7.0 | +0.5 | CBCX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | CXM Direct |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.5 | 7.0 | +0.5 | CBCX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.5 | 7.0 | +0.5 | CBCX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CBCX vs CXM Direct
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CBCX | CXM Direct |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CBCX MARKETS LIMITED | CXM Direct LLC |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | AMR Building 3, 9 Concorde East Road, Bedfordview, 2007, South Africa Suite 403, 4th Floor, The Catalyst Building, Plot 40 Silicon Avenue, Ebene, Port Louis, Mauritius Intershore Suite, Le Sanalele Complex, PO Box 608, Apia, Samoa 20 Victoria St, London, SW1H 0NB, England, UK | Office No. 518 Signature by Regus, 15 St Helen's Place, London, EC3A 6DQ, United Kingdom |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Commodities | Currency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfolios |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, Indonesian, English, French, Thai | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CBCX and CXM Direct against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CBCX vs CXM Direct
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CBCX or CXM Direct?
Both CBCX and CXM Direct hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CBCX maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), FSCA, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CXM Direct maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CBCX and CXM Direct?
In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CBCX records an Overall Score of 7.5 (Risk & Licensing: 7.5, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with CXM Direct at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do CBCX and CXM Direct differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CBCX lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while CXM Direct lists Currency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfolios with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CBCX or CXM Direct?
CBCX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CXM Direct carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.