Skip to content
QuantCalc Tools
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CBCX vs Luno Wallet: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CBCX (CBCX MARKETS LIMITED) and Luno Wallet (Luno Wallet) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar

CBCX 6D Score
7.5
Luno Wallet 6D Score
3.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: cbcx-vs-luno-wallet

CBCX outranks Luno Wallet by +4.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.5 vs 3.0)

On supervisory breadth, CBCX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Luno Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCBCXLuno WalletScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.53.0+4.5CBCX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.53.0+4.5CBCX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.02.0+2.0CBCX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.53.0+4.5CBCX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.53.0+4.5CBCX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CBCX vs Luno Wallet

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CBCX vs Luno Wallet
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CBCX and Luno Wallet.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCBCXLuno Wallet
Primary Legal NameCBCX MARKETS LIMITEDLuno Wallet
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressAMR Building 3, 9 Concorde East Road, Bedfordview, 2007, South Africa Suite 403, 4th Floor, The Catalyst Building, Plot 40 Silicon Avenue, Ebene, Port Louis, Mauritius Intershore Suite, Le Sanalele Complex, PO Box 608, Apia, Samoa 20 Victoria St, London, SW1H 0NB, England, UK--
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesPrecious metals, Indices, Forex, CommoditiesSafe and convenient cryptocurrency management and trading services
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, Indonesian, English, French, ThaiEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CBCX and Luno Wallet against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CBCX vs Luno Wallet

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CBCX or Luno Wallet?

CBCX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, CBCX maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), FSCA, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Luno Wallet maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CBCX and Luno Wallet?

In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CBCX records an Overall Score of 7.5 (Risk & Licensing: 7.5, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Luno Wallet at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do CBCX and Luno Wallet differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CBCX lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Luno Wallet lists Safe and convenient cryptocurrency management and trading services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CBCX or Luno Wallet?

CBCX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Luno Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CBCX vs Luno Wallet (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | QuantCalc Tools