1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Faba vs IG: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Faba (Faba) and IG (IG Markets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar
- Faba 6D Score
- 5.0
- IG 6D Score
- 8.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 4
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
IG outranks Faba by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Faba holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas IG holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Faba | IG | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 8.0 | +3.0 | IG |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 8.0 | +3.0 | IG |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | IG |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 9.0 | +4.0 | IG |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 8.0 | +3.0 | IG |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Faba vs IG
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Faba | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Faba | IG Markets |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Varšavská 715/36, 120 00 Praha 2, CZ | Cannon Bridge House 25 Dowgate Hill London EC4R 2YA |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | FX, indices, stock CFDs, digital cryptocurrencies, options trading and related services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | IG Trading: CFDs & stocks, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Other regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Faba and IG against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Faba vs IG
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Faba or IG?
IG holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 0). Specifically, Faba maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas IG maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSCA, MAS, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Faba and IG?
In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Faba records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with IG at 8.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 9.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do Faba and IG differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Faba lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while IG lists FX, indices, stock CFDs, digital cryptocurrencies, options trading and related services with execution software [IG Trading: CFDs & stocks, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Faba or IG?
Faba carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while IG carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.