1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FSDS Global vs InterTrader: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FSDS Global (FSDS Global) and InterTrader (InterTrader Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar
- FSDS Global 6D Score
- 1.0
- InterTrader 6D Score
- 7.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
InterTrader outranks FSDS Global by +6.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, FSDS Global holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas InterTrader holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FSDS Global | InterTrader | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 7.0 | +6.0 | InterTrader |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | InterTrader |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | InterTrader |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 6.0 | +5.0 | InterTrader |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 7.0 | +6.0 | InterTrader |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FSDS Global vs InterTrader
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FSDS Global | InterTrader |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FSDS Global | InterTrader Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | GB | 10 lower thames street, london ec3r 6af |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds, Spread Betting, CFD Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Italian, Vietnamese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FSDS Global and InterTrader against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FSDS Global vs InterTrader
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FSDS Global or InterTrader?
InterTrader holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FSDS Global maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas InterTrader maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FSDS Global and InterTrader?
In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FSDS Global records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with InterTrader at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do FSDS Global and InterTrader differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FSDS Global lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while InterTrader lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities, Bonds, Spread Betting, CFD Trading with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FSDS Global or InterTrader?
FSDS Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while InterTrader carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.