1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GMI vs KAMA Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GMI (Global Market Index Limited) and KAMA Capital (KAMA Capital) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar
- GMI 6D Score
- 6.0
- KAMA Capital 6D Score
- 5.8
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
GMI outranks KAMA Capital by +0.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.8)
On supervisory breadth, GMI holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas KAMA Capital holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GMI | KAMA Capital | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 5.8 | +0.2 | GMI |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 7.5 | +1.5 | KAMA Capital |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.6 | +0.4 | GMI |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.6 | +0.4 | GMI |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GMI vs KAMA Capital
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GMI | KAMA Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Global Market Index Limited | KAMA Capital |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Govant Building, BP 1276 Port Vila, Vanuatu | GB |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, energy, precious metals and related services CFDs trading services | FX, main indices, CFDs, futures, oil, energy, metals and commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Indonesian, Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, Malay, English, Thai | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GMI and KAMA Capital against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GMI vs KAMA Capital
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GMI or KAMA Capital?
GMI holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, GMI maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas KAMA Capital maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GMI and KAMA Capital?
In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GMI records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with KAMA Capital at 5.8 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.5, Brand: 5.6, Market Influence: 5.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do GMI and KAMA Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GMI lists FX, indices, energy, precious metals and related services CFDs trading services with execution software [MT4], while KAMA Capital lists FX, main indices, CFDs, futures, oil, energy, metals and commodities with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GMI or KAMA Capital?
GMI carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while KAMA Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.