Skip to content
QuantCalc Tools
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

InvestEngine vs Sticky Pixel: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of InvestEngine (InvestEngine (UK) Limited) and Sticky Pixel (Sticky Pixel) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar

InvestEngine 6D Score
7.0
Sticky Pixel 6D Score
1.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: investengine-vs-sticky-pixel

InvestEngine outranks Sticky Pixel by +6.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, InvestEngine holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Sticky Pixel holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightInvestEngineSticky PixelScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.01.0+6.0InvestEngine
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.01.0+6.0InvestEngine
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.01.0+4.0InvestEngine
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.01.0+6.0InvestEngine
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.01.0+6.0InvestEngine

Visual Architecture Benchmark: InvestEngine vs Sticky Pixel

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: InvestEngine vs Sticky Pixel
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between InvestEngine and Sticky Pixel.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeInvestEngineSticky Pixel
Primary Legal NameInvestEngine (UK) LimitedSticky Pixel
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressLawford House, Albert Place, London, United Kingdom,N3 1QAGB
Offered Asset Classes & Servicesfund managementMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare InvestEngine and Sticky Pixel against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: InvestEngine vs Sticky Pixel

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: InvestEngine or Sticky Pixel?

InvestEngine holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, InvestEngine maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Sticky Pixel maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between InvestEngine and Sticky Pixel?

In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), InvestEngine records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Sticky Pixel at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do InvestEngine and Sticky Pixel differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

InvestEngine lists fund management with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Sticky Pixel lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: InvestEngine or Sticky Pixel?

InvestEngine carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Sticky Pixel carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

InvestEngine vs Sticky Pixel (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | QuantCalc Tools