1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
4T Limited vs CryptoFacilities: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 4T Limited (4T Limited) and CryptoFacilities (CryptoFacilities) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar
- 4T Limited 6D Score
- 5.0
- CryptoFacilities 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
4T Limited and CryptoFacilities are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, 4T Limited holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CryptoFacilities holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 4T Limited | CryptoFacilities | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | 4T Limited |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | 4T Limited |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | 4T Limited |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 4T Limited vs CryptoFacilities
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 4T Limited | CryptoFacilities |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 4T Limited | CryptoFacilities |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Seychelles, Mahe, Victoria, Olivier Maradan Building, 1st Floor | GB |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, commodities, government bonds, stocks | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Arabic, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 4T Limited and CryptoFacilities against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 4T Limited vs CryptoFacilities
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 4T Limited or CryptoFacilities?
Both 4T Limited and CryptoFacilities hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 4T Limited maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CryptoFacilities maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 4T Limited and CryptoFacilities?
In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 4T Limited records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with CryptoFacilities at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do 4T Limited and CryptoFacilities differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
4T Limited lists FX, indices, commodities, government bonds, stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while CryptoFacilities lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 4T Limited or CryptoFacilities?
4T Limited carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CryptoFacilities carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.