1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
bybit vs CXM Direct: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of bybit (bybit) and CXM Direct (CXM Direct LLC) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar
- bybit 6D Score
- 8.0
- CXM Direct 6D Score
- 7.0
- Regulated Licences
- 4 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
bybit outranks CXM Direct by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 7.0)
On supervisory breadth, bybit holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 8 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CXM Direct holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | bybit | CXM Direct | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 | bybit |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 | bybit |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | bybit |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 | bybit |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 | bybit |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: bybit vs CXM Direct
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | bybit | CXM Direct |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | bybit | CXM Direct LLC |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 4 regulated / 8 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FMA: Not suppliedCMB: Not suppliedNational Bank of Georgia (NBG): Not suppliedCYSEC: Not suppliedAFSA: #AFSA-A-LA-2024-0027 | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 40A Orchard Road, Macdonald House, #03-01, Singapore 238838 | Office No. 518 Signature by Regus, 15 St Helen's Place, London, EC3A 6DQ, United Kingdom |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Currency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfolios |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Bybit Fintech Limited | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Indonesian, Spanish, Filipino, Kazakh, Polish and other languages | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare bybit and CXM Direct against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: bybit vs CXM Direct
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: bybit or CXM Direct?
bybit holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 2). Specifically, bybit maintains 8 total recorded filing(s) (FMA, CMB, National Bank of Georgia (NBG), CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CXM Direct maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between bybit and CXM Direct?
In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), bybit records an Overall Score of 8.0 (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0), compared with CXM Direct at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do bybit and CXM Direct differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
bybit lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [Bybit Fintech Limited], while CXM Direct lists Currency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfolios with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: bybit or CXM Direct?
bybit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CXM Direct carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.