Skip to content
QuantCalc Tools
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CXM Direct vs FXTech: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CXM Direct (CXM Direct LLC) and FXTech (FXTechTrading) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected firm records: UK, Ireland and Gibraltar

CXM Direct 6D Score
7.0
FXTech 6D Score
1.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: cxm-direct-vs-fxtech

CXM Direct outranks FXTech by +6.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, CXM Direct holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FXTech holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCXM DirectFXTechScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.01.0+6.0CXM Direct
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.01.0+6.0CXM Direct
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.01.0+4.0CXM Direct
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.01.0+6.0CXM Direct
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.01.0+6.0CXM Direct

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CXM Direct vs FXTech

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CXM Direct vs FXTech
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CXM Direct and FXTech.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCXM DirectFXTech
Primary Legal NameCXM Direct LLCFXTechTrading
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressOffice No. 518 Signature by Regus, 15 St Helen's Place, London, EC3A 6DQ, United KingdomGB
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCurrency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfoliosForex
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CXM Direct and FXTech against other regulated peers in our selected firm records: uk, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CXM Direct vs FXTech

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CXM Direct or FXTech?

CXM Direct holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, CXM Direct maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FXTech maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CXM Direct and FXTech?

In QuantCalc Tools's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CXM Direct records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with FXTech at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do CXM Direct and FXTech differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CXM Direct lists Currency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfolios with execution software [MT4], while FXTech lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CXM Direct or FXTech?

CXM Direct carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FXTech carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CXM Direct vs FXTech (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | QuantCalc Tools